Tuesday, October 16, 2012

More Biden lies

Mark Thiessen points out another lie from Joe Biden in the debate about Syria. The New York Times reported on Sunday that most of the arms that are being shipped into Syria for rebel groups are ending up in the hands of hard-line Islamic jihadists.
That conclusion, of which President Obama and other senior officials are aware from classified assessments of the Syrian conflict that has now claimed more than 25,000 lives, casts into doubt whether the White House’s strategy of minimal and indirect intervention in the Syrian conflict is accomplishing its intended purpose of helping a democratic-minded opposition topple an oppressive government, or is instead sowing the seeds of future insurgencies hostile to the United States.

“The opposition groups that are receiving the most of the lethal aid are exactly the ones we don’t want to have it,” said one American official familiar with the outlines of those findings, commenting on an operation that in American eyes has increasingly gone awry.
And Joe Biden should have known that his statements about Syria during his debate last week were totally false.
“We are working hand and glove with the Turks, with the Jordanians, with the Saudis, and with all the people in the region attempting to identify the people who deserve the help so that when Assad goes — and he will go — there will be a legitimate government that follows on, not an al-Qaeda-sponsored government that follows on,” Biden declared.
Exactly opposite the briefings that Obama and "senior officials" have received about what is happening in Syria. As Thiessen writes,
If this is the assessment of our intelligence community, why did Biden say the exact opposite in the debate last week? When Biden was asked during the debate why requests for additional security in Libya were denied, he pleaded ignorance and blamed the State Department, declaring: “We weren’t told they wanted more security there.” But in the case of Syria, the Times reports, the President and his national security team were told that the aid was going to “hard-line Islamic jihadists.” Yet Biden plainly asserted aid was going to “people who deserve the help” and “free forces inside Syria” and not jihadists. It is simply implausible that, if President Obama and his top national security advisers were aware of the intelligence assessments, Biden was not.

The revelation that the Obama administration has presided over the development of an arms pipeline to al-Qaeda in Syria — and Biden’s apparently deliberate untruth about it in last week’s debate — is the latest Obama foreign policy coverup.
It probably won't come up in tonight's townhall debate, but this second coverup by the Obama administration should definitely be a subject for Romney to raise next week in the last debate that is supposed to focus on foreign affairs.

There is a trend with both the Libya and Syria stories - actions that the Obama administration has taken that have been terrible failures and about which they've mislead the American people. Imagine if George W. Bush were doing the same in the last weeks before his reelection. If the media won't pick up the stories beyond one story in the New York Times and make sure that their coverage gets answers, Romney will have to do the job for them.