Tuesday, May 01, 2012

Obama's spiked football

Michael Mukasey, who served as Bush's attorney general after the unlamented departure of Alberto Gonzales, rightly smacks down Obama's self-praise for ordering the raid on bin Laden's compound and the entire approach the Obama administration has taken towards intelligence.
Moreover, the president does not seem to have addressed at all the possibility of seizing material with intelligence value—which may explain his disclosure immediately following the event not only that bin Laden was killed, but also that a valuable trove of intelligence had been seized, including even the location of al Qaeda safe-houses. That disclosure infuriated the intelligence community because it squandered the opportunity to exploit the intelligence that was the subject of the boast.

The only reliable weapon that any administration has against the current threat to this country is intelligence. Every operation like the one against bin Laden (or the one that ended the career of Anwar al-Awlaki, the U.S. citizen and al Qaeda propagandist killed in a drone attack last September) dips into the reservoir of available intelligence. Refilling that reservoir apparently is of no importance to an administration that, after an order signed by the president on his second day in office, has no classified interrogation program—and whose priorities are apparent from its swift decision to reopen investigations of CIA operators for alleged abuses in connection with the classified interrogation program that once did exist.
Mukasey rightly compares Obama's self-congratulation and focus on himself in how he emphasized his own role in the killing of bin Laden rather than focusing his praise to those who gathered the intelligence, planned the attack, and carried it out.
While contemplating how the killing of bin Laden reflects on the president, consider the way he emphasized his own role in the hazardous mission accomplished by SEAL Team 6:

"I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority . . . even as I continued our broader effort. . . . Then, after years of painstaking work by my intelligence community I was briefed . . . I met repeatedly with my national security team . . . And finally last week I determined that I had enough intelligence to take action. . . . Today, at my direction . . ."
Mukasey draws the contrast with other great leaders at similar moments of triumph in their presidencies. Just think of how Abraham Lincoln in his Second Inaugural, given at a time when the collapse of the Confederacy was imminent, spent his speech contemplating how slavery was "somehow the cause of the war," and how the "scourge of war" would last "until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword." And then he went on to ask for "malice toward none, with charity for all" as we fought on until the end of the war. Every time I teach Lincoln's Second Inaugural, I marvel at the modesty of that speech and how Lincoln took a moment when any other president might rightly have taken the opportunity to praise himself and the course he took to stick out the fighting even at the lowest moments when so many in the North advised some sort of negotiated conclusion and instead spent the address to contemplate the country's sin of slavery and how this war was God's righteous reaction to that offense. And he concluded by attempting to bring the nation together just as the war was going to force the country back together.

No such grace for Obama. Mukasey reminds us of how George W. Bush announced the capture of Saddam Hussein. Note the contrast to Obama's announcement.
The man from whom President Obama has sought incessantly to distance himself, George W. Bush, also had occasion during his presidency to announce to the nation a triumph of intelligence: the capture of Saddam Hussein. He called that success "a tribute to our men and women now serving in Iraq." He attributed it to "the superb work of intelligence analysts who found the dictator's footprints in a vast country. The operation was carried out with skill and precision by a brave fighting force. Our servicemen and women and our coalition allies have faced many dangers. . . . Their work continues, and so do the risks."

He did mention himself at the end: "Today, on behalf of the nation, I thank the members of our Armed Forces and I congratulate them."
While the orders for the raid on bin Laden's compound included an escape clause that put the responsibility on Admiral McRaven for the "operational decision making and control" and the presentation of the "risk profile" given to the President, contrast that with Eisenhower's behavior on the eve of ordering the D-Day landings.
Dwight Eisenhower is famous for having penned a statement to be issued in anticipation of the failure of the Normandy invasion that reads in relevant part: "My decision to attack at this time and place was based upon the best information available. The troops, the air and the Navy did all that bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame attaches to the attempt it is mine alone."

A week later, when the success of the invasion was apparent, Eisenhower saluted the Allied Expeditionary Forces: "One week ago this morning there was established through your coordinated efforts our first foothold in northwestern Europe. High as was my preinvasion confidence in your courage, skill and effectiveness . . . your accomplishments . . . have exceeded my brightest hopes.

Eisenhower did mention himself at the end: "I truly congratulate you upon a brilliantly successful beginning. . . . Liberty loving people everywhere would today like to join me in saying to you, 'I am proud of you.'"

Such examples are worth remembering every time President Obama claims bin Laden bragging rights.
Is Obama spiking the football in Romney's face because that is the only thing he has left to run on?
The increasingly unavoidable conclusion is that this is the only thing this President thinks he can campaign on. ObamaCare and the stimulus, his two main legislative achievements, are unpopular. Even liberals say Dodd-Frank didn't solve the too-big-to-fail bank problem. Two-thirds of the country thinks the economy is still in recession.

Ergo, wave the bloody shalwar kameez of bin Laden in a way that would have got Karl Rove hooted out of Washington had he tried anything remotely like it.

Voters aren't likely to believe that any Presidential candidate would fail to pursue the man who killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11. But there is a danger in all of this for the incumbent in the White House.

One of Barack Obama's remaining campaign advantages is that most people still like and respect him personally. Lose that advantage, and we wouldn't want to be the campaign strategist who has to break his fall.
And now he has repeated his criticism of Romney from the White House during a joint press conference with the prime minister of Japan.
"I'd just recommend that everybody take a look at people's previous statements in terms of whether they thought it was appropriate to go into Pakistan and to take out bin Laden," Obama said, obviously taking a shot at Romney. "I assume that people meant what they said when they said it. And that's been at least my practice. I said that I would go after bin Laden if we had a clear shot at him--and I did. If there are others who have said one thing and now suggest they would do something else, then I'd go ahead and let them explain it."

The president was visibly smirking as he made today's statement. It also mirrors a campaign ad the president released Friday, which likewise suggests that Romney wouldn't have killed bin Laden if he, as commander in chief, would have been in the same position.
How crass to issue such a crack during a joint White House press conference. The man has no class or sense of what is appropriate in a true leader. Even present and former Navy SEALs are saying enough is enough.

Obama's need to not only take credit for the attack on bin Laden but then to try and argue that somehow he knows that Mitt Romney wouldn't have ordered the attack in a similar situation has distracted from the praise that Obama is due for the death of bin Laden. His spiked football, that he told us Americans didn't need to do, has muddied Obama's message. But then grace and modesty are not characteristics that have ever been associated with Barack Obama.


mark said...

Poor repubs just can't get over the fact that Obama went after and killed OBL after Bush gave up. Plenty of conservatives here and elsewhere provided cover for Bush's cowardly statements by saying it wasn't worth the money and effort to kill the man who oversaw the attack on our country. Besides, he was already dead.
Judging by the ridicule heaped on Carter for the failed mission to rescue the hostages, I'm guessing repubs would be doing the same to Obama if the mission had failed. According to repubs, Carter gets all the blame for failure (and no credit for trying), and Obama gets none of the credit for success.
While bringing up Romney's quotes and criticisms was a mistake (save it for later), it's absurd to be criticizing Obama after giving a pass to Bush's premature "Mission-Accomplished" strut.
Contray to what many here have said, killing Osama wasn't an "easy call". Obama took the high-risk, high pay-off approach, and the men and women who carried out the attack did superbly. But it would not have happed without Obama.

Country Conservative said...

I think the point is the Obama I, I, I, I, I speech. The examples of previous leaders speeches in equally monumental moments is one of humility and of praise for the people who actually did the ground work and gathered the intelligence. A leader who makes the decision to "go for it" says yes or no. At the time Obama made his announcement I was taken back by his arrogance. I would have the same opinion of his arrogance whether he was D / R / I / or Nazi.

Celia said...

Mark, your comments are wrong on so many levels. As has been explained in numerous venues the "Mission Accomplished" banner referred only to that particular ship's mission, which HAD been completed, was NOT hung there by George Bush to tout himself. All of the information presented demonstrates the difference between a narcissistic opportunist who makes decisions based on how much credit he can claim if all goes right and who he can blame if it fails. The contrast between Obama and true leaders, like Bush, Lincoln, and Eisenhower,honorable men who chose to act based on right and wrong, not political expedience, and who gave credit to the men and women who actually risked life and limb in defense of our great nation, rather than posturing about how great he was to come in off the back 9 to sit in the corner and watch truly great men do the hard work is like night and day.

mark said...

Bush? A true leader?
Bush had his moment on a pile of rubble standing along a firefighter, but that was about it. (Although he did lead those children in reading "My Little Pony" while the country was under attack, I'm not prepared to give him that one.)

Where is this great leader now? Why isn't he out there helping repubs get re-elected? Bill Clinton, who embarassed our country with Monica Lewinsky, has more gravitas among dems and repubs alike than W. His absence from the campaing is all the proof needed to realize he was a failure.

But good one, Cecelia. Thanks for the laugh.

Btw: the Bush administration already acknowledged the banner was a mistake. And you really don't think it was all a political stunt?

Jon Hunter said...

Celia - That's the biggest crock of a statement I have ever heard. Bush flew the "mission accomplished" banner, not for that ship, but for the entire war. Obama ended it.

Bush a true leader? Seriously? Where were you when the market was tumbling down, down, down, and the start of bailouts began?

As to the comment to Mitt... well, he did say that he wouldn't go after Osama. Plain and simple. Your man, your R, wouldn't go after the most wanted man in the world. No, he's too busy feeding the rich and starving the poor. He's a crock of a leader, and he doesn't deserve your vote.

pumping-irony said...

Yeah, Obama "got" OBL - he nailed him with an errant drive off the 18th hole. But even if we give credit to the great Obama for "getting" OBL (though Adm McRaven and Leon Panetta might disagree he deserves any) there is one thing the superguy can't do.... he apparently can't stop talking about it.

Rick Caird said...

No, Mark, what most people cannot get over is how Obama is trying to take credit for deeds done by others. Obama, like you, is a petty little man who is far past his level of incompetence and it shows in his inability to recognize who has done what.

I realize these are difficult concepts for you to follow, but two Beta males like you and Obama can only take credit for others work. There own work does not have enough merit.

mark said...

Can we finally put to rest the lie about the banner not being the idea of the White House?:

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for the banner – Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past – Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day, because it did send the wrong message."

Dr Weevil said...

As evidence that the banner was "the idea of the White House", mark quotes a story that includes the words "after people on the aircraft carrier approached the White House with the idea". Whether mark's problem is illiteracy or dishonesty is not clear, but it must be one or the other.

mark said...

You got me there, Dr. Weevil. I should have said the "decision" to hang the banner came from the White House, not the "idea".
Another solid contribution.
I wonder who made the decision to have Bush put on a jumpsuit and strut across the carrier. If only there had been a "Decider" present. Or for that matter, when the August PDB arrived, or the news that the country was under attack, etc. etc. etc.

Dr Weevil said...

Actually, 'mark', you should have kept your stupid comment to yourself. If you're going to accuse someone else of telling a "lie", you should first make sure that it is in fact a false statement (intentional or not) rather than a literally true one. Otherwise, you risk looking like a liar yourself, particularly when your apology is as grudging and dishonest and wholly inadequate as this one.

mark said...

Silly Weevil. It wasn't intended as an apology. Just an acknowledgement that I should have used a different word.