Banner ad

Monday, January 30, 2012

Poster boy for what the teacher unions have wrought

The New York Post has a sadly believable story about how one New York city teacher has been raking in the big bucks even though he hasn't been allowed in a classroom for a decade.
Deemed a danger to kids, the typing teacher with a $10 million real estate portfolio hasn’t been allowed in a classroom for more than a decade, but still collects $100,049 a year in city salary — plus health benefits, a growing pension nest egg, vacation and sick pay.

Mayor Bloomberg and Gov. Cuomo can call for better teacher evaluations until they’re blue-faced, but Rosenfeld and six peers with similar gigs costing about $650,000 a year in total salaries are untouchable. Under a system shackled by protections for tenured teachers, they can’t be fired, the DOE says.

.... Since the DOE closed the teacher holding pens in June 2010, those facing disciplinary charges were scattered to offices and given tasks such as answering phones, filing and photocopying.

But Rosenfeld and six others whose cases have long been closed are “permanently reassigned.” Rosenfeld reports to the Division of School Facilities, which maintains DOE buildings, in a warehouse in Long Island City.

Asked what work he does, Rosenfeld laughingly told his friend, “Oh, I Xeroxed something the other day.”

Rosenfeld could have retired four years ago at 62, but his pension grows by $1,700 for each year he stays — even without teaching. If he quit today, his annual pension would total an estimated $85,400.

“Why not make it bigger?” the friend said.

Rosenfeld will also get paid for 100 unused sick days when he leaves.

New York has no mandatory retirement age for teachers.
Meanwhile, charter schools have the ability to get rid of bad teachers, not just those accused of inappropriate behavior with children, but those who can't teach. No wonder the teacher unions despise charters.

1 comment:

John A said...

I read a piece the other day about Finland's schools, and [supposedly] why they are doing so much better than before, better than other countries such as the US. The article's author, and the Finnish school administrator talked to, acsribed it to there being no non-public schools (all, through a college B.A., are government) and no choices, aka competetion.

Buried in there as a throw-away bit of no importance to them:
"what matters is that in Finland all teachers and administrators are given prestige, decent pay, and a lot of responsibility. .... If a teacher is bad, it is the principal's responsibility to notice and deal with it."