Friday, November 18, 2011

Who's putting politics ahead of the good of the nation?

Charles Krauthammer examines the President's decision to put any decision on the Keystone XL pipeline until after the election.
So what do you do when you say you can, but, it turns out, you can’t? Blame the other guy. Charge the Republicans with making governing impossible. Never mind that you had control of Congress for two-thirds of your current tenure. It’s all the fault of Republican rejectionism.

Hence: “We Can’t Wait.” We can’t wait while they obstruct. We can’t wait while they dither with my jobs bill. Write Congress today! Vote Democratic tomorrow!

We can’t wait. Except for certain exceptions, such as the 1,700-mile trans-USA Keystone XL pipeline, carrying Alberta oil to Texas refineries, that would have created thousands of American jobs and increased our energy independence.

For that, we can wait, it seems. President Obama decreed that any decision must wait 12 to 18 months — postponed, by amazing coincidence, until after next year’s election.
After detailing all the reasons why the environmentalist objections are not worth putting any faith in, yet Obama desired to appease the environmentalists and so postponed the decision. All this will do is send the Canadian oil to China. There will be no diminishing of output; it just won't come here. And we won't have the jobs that building the pipeline in the U.S. would have provided. When it comes to actual shovel-ready jobs, Obama decided not to allow them in the United States.

What does this tell us about Obama? He's quite willing to put politics over the good of the nation all the while telling us that the Republicans are the ones doing so.
It’s hard to think of a more clear-cut case of putting politics over nation. This from a president whose central campaign theme is that Republicans put party over nation, sacrificing country to crass political ends.

Nor is this the first time Obama’s election calendar trumped the national interest:

● Obama’s decision to wind down the Afghan surge in September 2012 is militarily inexplicable. It comes during the fighting season. It was recommended by none of his military commanders. It is explicable only as a talking point for the final days of his reelection campaign.

● At the height of the debt-ceiling debate last July, Obama pledged to veto any agreement that was not long-term. Definition of long term? By another amazing coincidence, any deal large enough to get him past Election Day (and thus avoid another such crisis next year).

●On Tuesday it was revealed that last year the administration pressured Solyndra, as it was failing, to delay its planned Oct. 28 announcement of layoffs until Nov. 3, the day after the midterm election.

A contemporaneous e-mail from a Solyndra investor noted: “Oddly they didn’t give a reason for that date.” The writer was obviously born yesterday. The American electorate was not — and it soon gets to decide who really puts party over nation and reelection above all.

We can’t wait.

1 comment:

ricrx said...

The President's only concern is getting four more years of lavish living at taxpayer's expense.

http://ricrx.wordpress.com/2011/11/16/can-the-solyndra-obama-connection-get-more-disgusting-why-yes/