Friday, August 27, 2010

The only card left for the liberals

We've been hearing a lot these days about what ugly, hateful bigots many Americans are. It seems that every time there is a disagreement with a liberal policy agenda, their main line of attack is to assail the motives of those who criticize them. Instead of allowing that one could have rational reasons for disagreeing with a chosen liberal policy, they assume that we could be motivated only by racism or some other base motive. Charles Krauthammer has a great column today looking at some of the examples of this playing of the race card that we've witnessed in the past couple of years.
Liberalism under siege is an ugly sight indeed. Just yesterday it was all hope and change and returning power to the people. But the people have proved so disappointing. Their recalcitrance has, in only 19 months, turned the predicted 40-year liberal ascendancy (James Carville) into a full retreat. Ah, the people, the little people, the small-town people, the "bitter" people, as Barack Obama in an unguarded moment once memorably called them, clinging "to guns or religion or" -- this part is less remembered -- "antipathy toward people who aren't like them."

That's a polite way of saying: clinging to bigotry. And promiscuous charges of bigotry are precisely how our current rulers and their vast media auxiliary react to an obstreperous citizenry that insists on incorrect thinking.

-- Resistance to the vast expansion of government power, intrusiveness and debt, as represented by the Tea Party movement? Why, racist resentment toward a black president.

-- Disgust and alarm with the federal government's unwillingness to curb illegal immigration, as crystallized in the Arizona law? Nativism.

-- Opposition to the most radical redefinition of marriage in human history, as expressed in Proposition 8 in California? Homophobia.

-- Opposition to a 15-story Islamic center and mosque near Ground Zero? Islamophobia.

Now we know why the country has become "ungovernable," last year's excuse for the Democrats' failure of governance: Who can possibly govern a nation of racist, nativist, homophobic Islamophobes?

Note what connects these issues. In every one, liberals have lost the argument in the court of public opinion. Majorities -- often lopsided majorities -- oppose President Obama's social-democratic agenda (e.g., the stimulus, Obamacare), support the Arizona law, oppose gay marriage and reject a mosque near Ground Zero.

What's a liberal to do? Pull out the bigotry charge, the trump that preempts debate and gives no credit to the seriousness and substance of the contrary argument. The most venerable of these trumps is, of course, the race card.
Read the rest.

Gosh, how times have changed. Americans who had displayed a mature and admiral open-mindedness by voting for an African-American for president 18 months ago are now displaying their inherent racism and innate bigotry. Who can keep track?

However, that trump card doesn't seem to hold the same magic powers that it has previously held. Perhaps it has been thrown down too many times. People are tired of being told how bitter and racist we are just because we don't agree with the elite class's chosen policies and opinions.

It is rather difficult to convince people of your argument if you start from the premise that your opponents are narrow-minded bigots. It shuts down all debate and leaves only name-calling. And such insults aren't persuasive; they're just irritating. Contempt is not a winning argument in debate or politics.