Banner ad

Thursday, March 04, 2010

Loony liberal columns

Here is the looniest column of the week: a Philadelphia Inquirer columnist, Stan Isaacs thinks that it's about time for President Obama to try packing the Supreme Court as FDR tried and failed to do. He wants the Democrats to add three new seats to the Court to counter the narrow conservative majority that voted to lift the ban on corporate advertising before an election in the Citizens Unitedcase. If the American people are skeptical of the procedures being used to craft and push through the Democrats' health care reforms, imagine how they'd react to an effort to pack the Supreme Court. I almost hope that some congressional Democrats try to take Isaacs up on his supremely stupid idea.

And here's the second looniest column of the week, this time courtesy of Maureen Dowd, who has been traveling through Saudi Arabia and thinks she detects an incipient renaissance in how women are treated there. In fact, she even allows herself to become the mouthpiece for a Saudi spokesman to attempt to portray Saudi society as being less hidebound by religious orthodoxy than Israel.
The Middle Eastern foreign minister was talking about enlightened “liberal” trends in his country, contrasting that with the benighted “extreme” conservative religious movement in a neighboring state.

But the wild thing was that the minister was Prince Saud al-Faisal of Saudi Arabia — an absolute Muslim monarchy ruling over one of the most religiously and socially intolerant places on earth — and the country he deemed too “religiously determined” and regressive was the democracy of Israel.

“We are breaking away from the shackles of the past,” the prince said, sitting in his sprawling, glinting ranch house with its stable of Arabian horses and one oversized white bunny. “We are moving in the direction of a liberal society. What is happening in Israel is the opposite; you are moving into a more religiously oriented culture and into a more religiously determined politics and to a very extreme sense of nationhood,” which was coming “to a boiling point.”

“The religious institutions in Israel are stymieing every effort at peace,” said the prince, wearing a black-and-gold robe and tinted glasses.
Say what? How removed from reality is Maureen Dowd? Is she not aware of how Saudis treat women who stray from the strict lines of behavior dictated by severe sharia law? Jennifer Rubin helps her out by linking to this horrific post by Rachel Abrams from last year's Weekly Standard.
Saudi Arabia, modern-day: A man finds his daughter exchanging messages with a male friend on Facebook and murders her. A young woman caught sitting in a car with a man who is not her relative gets gang-raped, is then sentenced to 90 lashes (or 200, depending on which news report you read) for having appeared thus in public, and is later beaten by her brother for bringing shame on the family.

Same place, same time: The marriage of an eight-year-old girl to a 48-year-old man is upheld by a judge despite her mother's attempts to have the marriage annulled. A death-row inmate sells his 15-year-old daughter in marriage to a fellow prisoner to pay off some debts. The marriage is consummated. "It is incorrect to say that it's not permitted to marry off girls who are 15 and younger," says Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Sheikh, the kingdom's grand mufti. "A girl aged 10 or 12 can be married. Those who think she's too young are wrong and they are being unfair to her."

Is there a connection between the ability of fathers and brothers to mete out "honor" punishments--including murder--to their daughters and sisters and the ability of grown men--men in their 60s, some of them, who may well have daughters and granddaughters of their own--to marry little girls? I say what binds them are the dual impulses to demonize and dehumanize females, and I say there's no difference between the two: Kill your own daughter? It can only be possible if you see her not (or no longer) as flesh of your flesh, but rather as a creature driven by evil inclinations to transgress your moral code. Rape a little girl? It can only be possible if you dissociate from her child-ness and her humanness--and ignore her agony--and see her as, well, a creature driven by evil inclinations to enjoy your predation.
While Dowd is over in the Middle East, perhaps she could swing by Israel and see if she can find similar stories of women being lashed for the crime of having been raped or children being forced to marry men in their 60s.


Pat Patterson said...

Hey, what's wrong with men in their sixties? Next thing you'll tell me that all of Donald Trump's wives didn't marry him for love.

Bachbone said...

Someone should give Dowd a puppy she could nuzzle and cuddle at night. A cute, little pup might sooth her and improve her outlook. I'd suggest a rottweiler or pit bull.

tfhr said...


I'm thinking she could name it "Moonbat".