And just to make sure, the Democrats have inserted an interesting and questionable provision in the bill to try to prevent future congresses from repealing Independent Medicare Advisory Board. Jim DeMint noted this last night.
there's one provision that i found particularly troubling and it's under section c, titled "limitations on changes to this subsection."It used to be a truism that one congress could not bind a future congress. Apparently, that isn't so when the Democrats are writing the rules.
and i quote -- "it shall not be in order in the senate or the house of representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection."
this is not legislation. it's not law. this is a rule change. it's a pretty big deal. we will be passing a new law and at the same time creating a senate rule that makes it out of order to amend or even repeal the law.
i'm not even sure that it's constitutional, but if it is, it most certainly is a senate rule. i don't see why the majority party wouldn't put this in every bill. if you like your law, you most certainly would want it to have force for future senates.
And the Democrats are not going to stop with their efforts to achieve a full public option. Even if they can't get it this year, they'll keep after it. Tom Harkin promises to continue the fight.
“It will be revisited,” Harkin said. “This is just the beginning. … What we’re building is a starter home, not a mansion. And guess what? We have room for expansions and additions later on.”This bill is just the first step. If they didn't get the full public option now, they'll be back over and over again. And if they aren't completely happy with the language on abortion, they'll be refighting that battle for year. This is just one battle in their 30 Years War to totally take over our entire health care industry.