Democrats who helped the sweeping climate change bill squeak through before jetting home for the July Fourth break got a surprisingly ugly homecoming, encountering a barrage of protests, attack ads and negative press. Police turned up at a local protest aimed at Rep. Allen Boyd (Fla.), a leader of the moderate Blue Dog Coalition. Freshman Rep. John Adler (N.J.) told a local paper he got shoved.It will pay to keep up the pressure on these guys.
The bruising endured by the moderates — along with serious substantive concerns —prompted them last week to derail the planned Friday rollout of the health care bill. And it presents a continuing challenge to leaders hoping to wrap work on the package this month. “They are completely and totally rattled,” one senior Democratic aide said of the centrists. “I’ve never seen them as bad as they are now.”
....Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), who chairs the Blue Dog health care task force, launched a pre-emptive strike against the three chairmen last week, warning that the overwhelming majority of Blue Dogs were prepared to vote against the health care bill unless major changes were made. Ross said previous attempts and meetings on the issue had failed to make the bill palatable to moderates, saying that there weren’t enough cost cuts nor was there enough consideration given to rural areas and small businesses. Blue Dogs also have serious concerns about the proposed public insurance option, which they said must not be based on Medicare payment rates.
....Other moderates remain skeptical. Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.) said groups are already pressuring lawmakers back home both on the climate vote and on health care, and he said the pressure on the latter is about to ratchet up dramatically. “The pot is starting to simmer, and in a couple of weeks it’ll be boiling,” he said.
They're especially tender now after many of them voted for the Waxman-Markey bill and now the Senate is getting skittish about when they'll vote for the bill and how it will look when they do.
Another concern is that the House will craft such a liberal bill that they'll have to jump off the cliff to vote for it and then all the important negotiations over the final version will be between a few key senators and the Obama administration. The final bill will be more moderate, as tends to happen once the Senate gets involved, but the Blue Dogs' votes would already be on record for the more radical version. That is what will happen with cap and trade and expect to see it again on health care.
A major source of concern for the centrists is that the legislation crafted by the three liberal chairmen is so far to the left that the House is being left out of the real deal-making between the White House, the Senate and key interest groups.Pelosi is rather dismissive of their concerns.
The three House chairmen writing the bill have said they aren’t bound by deals the White House and the Senate cut with drug companies, hospitals and other groups since they weren’t included in the negotiations.
That has caused heartburn among Democrats from swing districts worried that they will again be asked to cast a tough vote on a bill many of them think is too liberal and is unlikely to become law — just as they were on the climate bill.
“I’m just looking for the bill to be in the mix in terms of what’s realistic in terms of the final outcome,” said Rep. Jason Altmire (Pa.), a Blue Dog and a New Democrat who voted against the climate bill. “If we put ours so far to the left, we’re not going to have any influence in the final product,” Altmire said.
And unless the House bill is close to what will ultimately be signed into law, “you are going to hang out a lot of those ’08 freshman on two votes ... that are hard to explain,” Altmire said.
Pelosi, asked about concerns by some Members that the House would back a public insurance plan only to see it defeated in the Senate, dismissed them as typical.That won't help these guys if they're in tough reelection campaigns and their opponents are running ads about their having voted for increased spending and taxes on measures that they couldn't even read before they voted on.
Republicans can take heart that, even though they can't block bad bills as they make their way through the House, perhaps the House leadership will be sowing the end of the political career of some of these Democrats recently elected in red districts.
7 comments:
Yeah, but Pelosi is still the Speaker, in control of the agenda. Whatever the moderates do is actually posturing for cover. Nothing much should be read into that. When the crunch comes, a couple of them will keel over for Grandma Pelosi. They may do that keeling over in turns, to keep the Speaker happy, their constituents fooled, and themselves safe. Nothing, in terms of what Pelosi really wants, will change.
It's really hard to be too cynical about this bunch.
Some people who voted for change are now seeing a change they don't care for. Maybe this Democratic control of the house and senate will be short lived.
"Maybe this Democratic control of the house and senate will be short lived."
Dream on, Bob. Once the Dems deliver socialized health care to all Americans, the GOP will be finally broken for several generations.
I for one applaud Congressman Altmire and the new Democrats. We have seen what happens when progressives get beyond the mainstream of the country. Whether their ideas are right or wrong is somewhat moot, things like Roe v. Wade, the Great Society, busing, etc., created 40 years of conservativism dominating American politics. Let's face it, America is very parochial, red-necked, myopic, and fearful. Trying to push too many liberal ideas is the best way to get yourself another George Bush faster than you can say "don't ask, don't tell". In the short term, the key is to protect the middle class and public education. Over time, with good education and a populace that can pay enough to stay politically mobile, utopian dreams may get closer to reality.
Mike McNally,
My, my, my, but aren't you open-minded with regard to those who don't think EXACTLY like you do.
"Let's face it, America is very parochial, red-necked, myopic, and fearful."
What a stupid thing to say.
But you actually topped that with, "...utopian dreams may get closer to reality".
When Thomas More wrote about a place with a perfect political and social system, he had to make up one [Utopia] because such places simply don't exist BECAUSE of REALITY!
If you choose to admire Altmire for being politically pragmatic that's fine but take it a step further and ask yourself why anyone at all would find it pragmatic to hobble a struggling economy with a half-baked, psuedo-science driven Global Warming bill or attempt to reroute the nation's largest source of employment, the health care industry, through a slow moving, costly bureaucracy like the federal government.
Jaw Bone,
I think your comment betrays your real priority ~ promoting one political party over another. You don't really put people or the country ahead of party politics, do you?
If medical care does become "socialized", as you put it, then it won't be the Republican party "finally broke for several generations", but rather the entire country and generations of people living within it!
Post a Comment