Banner ad

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Democratic scandals

Eve Fairbanks writes in the New Republic to explain why all these Democratic scandals we've seen recently don't really matter yet. Her point is that these are mostly scandals on the state level that don't involve the party leaders. There is no link between scandals like Jack Abramaoff provided for several Republican scandals. But then several of the Republican scandals weren't linked. Except by their tawdriness like with Mark Foley and Larry Craig. And, as Fairbanks concludes, the Democrats have their trump card. People don't despise Obama like they despise Bush.

It is the media who gets to decide whether scandals matter or not. While the media isn't ignoring the whole Blagojevich cess pool, we're not getting the steady drip drip on some of these other scandals. For example, The Wall Street Journal points out that Chris Dodd is still serving as Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee despite clear indications that he received sweetheart deals from Countrywide Financial which was just purchased by Bank of America which Dodd oversees. And Dodd, despite his promises, has still not released the details on the cozy loans he received as a Friend of Angelo at Countrywide.
With the opening of the 111th Congress yesterday, all of Washington is tingling with the allure of a fresh start. Not so fast. We've got some leftover business from the 110th Congress -- namely, Chris Dodd's July 2008 promise to release the details of his sweetheart loans from Countrywide Financial.
[Review & Outlook] AP

The Connecticut Senator got favored treatment from the subprime mortgage purveyor, even as he was a power broker on the Banking Committee that regulates the industry. When the news broke, the Senator first denied that he sought or expected preferential treatment. He later admitted that he knew he was considered a VIP at the firm but claimed he thought it was "more of a courtesy." He also promised the Connecticut press that he'd come clean with the documents and details of the loans. But six months later -- nada, zip, nothing.

The rest of the press corps may have moved on, but we'd still like to know. All the more so because former Countrywide Financial loan officer Robert Feinberg told us last fall that Mr. Dodd knowingly saved thousands of dollars on his refinancing of two properties in 2003 as part of a special program for the influential. Mr. Feinberg also reported that he has internal company documents that prove Mr. Dodd knew he was getting preferential treatment as a friend of Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide's then-CEO, and Mr. Feinberg has offered to provide those documents to investigators.

Just before Mr. Dodd made his promise, Bank of America closed its acquisition of Countrywide and Mr. Dodd has continued to oversee BofA and the rest of the mortgage industry as Chairman of Senate Banking. He will now play a lead role in drafting legislation affecting the very business that gave him preferential treatment, yet he still refuses to release the mortgage documents that would illuminate this treatment.
Contrary to Ms. Fairbanks, this is a scandal that involves the Senate Democratic leaders because they allow Dodd to remain as chairman despite such a conflict of interests. You can add in the House Democrats keeping Charlie Rangel in his place as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee responsible for writing tax laws despite his constellation of scandals, some of which involve tax evasion. Then there is the suspicious circumstances of his preserving a tax loophole for an oil drilling company at the same time that the chief executive of the company donated a million dollars to the Charles B. Rangel School of Public Service at City College of New York. It's not really much different from Blagojevich's whole pay to play schemes in Illinois.

But these are Democratic committee chairman so I guess Fairbanks is right and they don't matter. What really connects all these Democratic and Republican scandals is that they involve people in power taking advantage of their power to behave in ways that we ordinary folk couldn't get away with.

6 comments:

toadold said...

I recall that both Pelosi, Reid, and their families were briefly reported to have been involved in shady land deals. Reid especially is supposed to have heavy connections with the land Barons of Los Vegas.
I don't think the crumbling bastions of the Main Stream Media are going to provide enough cover in the future for Democrats caught with their heads in the honey pot.

Pat Patterson said...

It seems that eventually whoever holds that Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. congressional seat comes to a messy and probably lucrative end. At least Rangel is not appearing on TV wearing a dashiki and a hubcap sized medallion.

Things to come?

Bachbone said...

"It is the media who gets to decide whether scandals matter or not."

This is but one serious GOP leadership deficiency, Betsy. With the exception of Cheney, and he seldom has been given the opportunity or leeway. from Bush on down, they have allowed the media and/or the opposition to define terms of arguments, what matters/does not matter, what happened/did not happen, etc. It started with Clintonistas trashing offices (e.g., removing "W" caps from keyboards, reprogramming phone lines, turning over desks, ripping presidential seals off walls), and Bush refusing even to confirm the extent or cost to taxpayers of the damages, which allowed the Left to deny it even happened until detailed reports were filed later.

Much later, Bush was quick to blast Trent Lott for an ill advised paean to Strom Thurmond, but has said virtually nothing about any Democrat scandal.

GOP leadership needn't be itching for a fight from dawn to dusk, but it at least ought to be willing and able to recognize what the opposition will throw at it and respond in a timely fashion. If it can't or won't, resign from leadership and let someone have the job who can and will.

ic said...

They don't matter because the MSM don't connect the dots, they actively suppress the links to the dots.

By the way, the "despised" Bush had nothing to do with the Republican scandals, not even the MSM could link them to him. On the other hand, the beloved Obama's name popped up quite a few times when those "don't matter" scandals reared their ugly heads. Go figure.

Righty64 said...

Keep in mind that when the Democrats ran Washington with Bill Clinton in the White House, it was a "culture of corruption" that one a contributing factor bringing congressional control to the GOP. And, the DDBMSOWM was covering up for the Democrats then too. A scandal is a scandal and if this keeps up and the GOP's new leadership can make the case that they will have learned from their mistakes, the brakes may be put on the Obama administration and Republicans may be running congress.

The Vegas Art Guy said...

Bachbone, even if Bush had come out firing, the press would have spun it to make him look as bad as possible. The point is that the press has the democratic party's back and will do as little reporting as possible on these scandals.