Banner ad

Friday, December 12, 2008

Don't relax, Obama still plans to transform the entire country

Charles Krauthammer explodes the growing myth that Barack Obama is planning to govern as a centrist. He warns us not to take comfort from the centrist, mainstream appoints for his foreign policy and economic team because that isn't where Obama's plans for transforming our country lie.
A functioning financial system is a necessary condition for a successful Obama presidency. As in foreign policy, Obama wants experts and veterans to manage and pacify universes in which he has little experience and less personal commitment. Their job is to keep credit flowing and the world at bay so that Obama can address his real ambition: to effect a domestic transformation as grand and ambitious as Franklin Roosevelt's.

As Obama revealingly said just last week, "This painful crisis also provides us with an opportunity to transform our economy to improve the lives of ordinary people." Transformation is his mission. Crisis provides the opportunity. The election provides him the power.

The deepening recession creates the opportunity for federal intervention and government experimentation on a scale unseen since the New Deal. A Republican administration has already done the ideological groundwork with its unprecedented intervention, culminating in the forced partial nationalization of nine of the largest banks, the kind of stuff that happens in Peronist Argentina with a gun on the table. Additionally, Henry Paulson's invention of the number $700 billion forever altered our perception of imaginable government expenditure. Twenty billion more for Citigroup? Lunch money.

Moreover, no one in Congress even pretends that spending should be pay as you go (i.e., new expenditures balanced by higher taxes or lower spending), as the Democrats disingenuously promised when they took over Congress last year. Even some conservative economists are urging stimulus (although structured far differently from Democratic proposals). And public opinion, demanding action, will buy any stimulus package of any size. The result: undreamed-of amounts of money at Obama's disposal.

To meet the opportunity, Obama has the political power that comes from a smashing electoral victory. It not only gave him a personal mandate. It increased Democratic majorities in both houses, thereby demonstrating coattails and giving him clout. And by running on nothing much more than change and (often contradictory) hopes, he has given himself enormous freedom of action.

Obama was quite serious when he said he was going to change the world. And now he has a national crisis, a personal mandate, a pliant Congress, a desperate public -- and, at his disposal, the greatest pot of money in galactic history. (I include here the extrasolar planets.)

It begins with a near $1 trillion stimulus package. This is where Obama will show himself ideologically. It is his one great opportunity to plant the seeds for everything he cares about: a new green economy, universal health care, a labor resurgence, government as benevolent private-sector "partner." The first hint came yesterday, when Obama claimed, "If we want to overcome our economic challenges, we must also finally address our health care challenge" -- the perfect non sequitur that gives carte blanche to whatever health-care reform and spending the Obama team dreams up. It is the community organizer's ultimate dream.

Ironically, when the economy tanked in mid-September, it was assumed that both presidential candidates could simply forget about their domestic agendas because with $700 billion drained by financial system rescues, not a penny would be left to spend on anything else.

On the contrary. With the country clamoring for action and with all psychological barriers to government intervention obliterated (by the conservative party, no less), the stage is set for a young, ambitious, supremely confident president -- who sees himself as a world-historical figure before even having been sworn in -- to begin a restructuring of the American economy and the forging of a new relationship between government and people.

Don't be fooled by Bob Gates staying on. Obama didn't get elected to manage Afghanistan. He intends to transform America. And he has the money, the mandate and the moxie to go for it.
Now that's a depressing prediction. And he's absolutely right that the Bush administration has laid the groundwork for this transformation. We won't recognize the country that emerges if he accomplishes all that he has in mind.

14 comments:

BLOOBITY said...

We won't recognize the country that emerges if he accomplishes all that he has in mind.

Uh... what's so great about the country right now? We're locked in perpetual war and the economy is collapsing. You don't want to transform that?

Charles Krauthammer, like most other conservative pundits, were totally wrong about everything they said during the campaign about who Obama would appoint. Why do you people still give these assholes credibility when they're only consistently wrong?

Bill B. said...

"This painful crisis also provides us with an opportunity to transform our economy to improve the lives of ordinary people."
Transformation is his mission.


Uh, no. Improving the lives of ordinary people is his mission.

Why are you arguing against improving the lives of ordinary Americans?

Sheldon said...

Krauthammer says Obama will deliver "a new green economy, universal health care, a labor resurgence, government as benevolent private-sector 'partner.'" This is bad because . . . ?

equitus said...

Sheldon, there are already societies trying to function on those principles and it's not working out so well. It is foolish to try to replicate that here.

Bill, it is in no way the purpose of the US Govt to improve the lives of ordinary people. It is the puprose of he US Govt to provide the freedom for ordinary people to improve their own lives.

Folk, move to Europe already. You'll love it there!

The Mighty Quinn said...

Improving the lives of ordinary people is his mission.

To see America's future, look to the Democrat occupied territories of Detroit, South Central LA and South Chicago.

Bill B. said...

Thank you for explaining your objection to "improving the lives of ordinary Americans", equitus.

The fact is that, like it or not, the US government is a huge factor in the lives of pretty much all Americans.

Under Bush and GOP policies of the last 8 years, the very richest among us have got even richer. We've seen how that hasn't worked very well for those who are not the top 1%. The slide into a second Great Depression is the result. All Obama is saying is that it's time we had a president who considered the effects of his policies on ordinary people.

And some things work better if they are organized on the national level - like the military for example. The example of every other country in the industrialized world, shows that health care is another example of something that works better and costs less when the risk is pooled nationally. The government is the only body that can accomplish that.

equitus said...

The fact is that, like it or not, the US government is a huge factor in the lives of pretty much all Americans.

I know this pleases you, Bill. But for a lot of the rest of us, this isn't good. The cost of this is freedom.

Health care "works better" when nationalized? That's not what I've been hearing.

Pat Patterson said...

A mere 25 years after the advent of the New Deal there was a identifiable, independent, coherent and non-fascist conservative movement in the country. One could argue that much of the roll back of government intervention in the post-war period was not just only a return to "normalcy" but a desire to trim back the intrusive nature of the beast. The left may argue that they are the vanguard and taking steps to the future but most often fail to acknowledge that there is also two or three steps in the direction of what are still perceived as what is normal vs. experimental.

tfhr said...

Biddle,

You said, "And some things work better if they are organized on the national level - like the military for example."

Come join me at a military clinic or health care facility and put that idea to the test. Before you suggest greater federal control of massive programs, come take a look at the daily phenomenal waste and abuse of DoD dollars. I wish you could see the plasma screens that wallpaper federal buildings and DoD offices and hallways!

If savings through efficiency via bureaucratic management is your goal, you will fail. If you want to fight a war and win, give us a call but you need to be on board from start to finish and be prepared for the cost.

Bill B. said...

As usual tfhr you are imagining something, and then complaining bitterly about what you imagine.

I would be quite happy with all Americans being eligible for the same health care plan that congressional reps get.

No need for massive amounts of federal bureaucracy or military-style incompetence (job still not done in Iraq, and now Bush has agreed to a timetable for retreat).

Pat Patterson said...

Even though Bill B is now contradicting himself by claiming he was not in favor of the government runnning a national health care system by merely demanding that all should have the same type of coverage and the same cost as those in Congress. And I'm sure that he has the utmost confidence in a system that takes very good care of 535 congressmen and which can pivot on a dime and expand to take care of some 304 million US citizens. Or less because I'm also sure that Bill B had no desire to also supply that same level of care to illegal aliens. No problem!

tfhr said...

Biddle,

A democratically elected Iraqi government that can manage it's own security has every right to dictate the terms of the Status of Forces Agreement. That is an enormous victory for us all! Why belittle a truly historic accomplishment? What is wrong with you?

But I am encouraged to see that you have wisely backed off of your desire to have the military manage your health care. Now if you can get it through your head that at that very moment in which "all Americans be[come] eligible for the same health care plan that congressional reps get", our elite representatives will find a way to take better care of their own at your expense, you will have taken a giant first step toward reality. Do you think you would ever sit in the hospital waiting room next to a grand senator? I'm trying to remember the last time I saw a flag officer in the emergency room waiting his turn!

For someone so taken with class warfare as you, I find it even more baffling than ever that you would eschew the free market solutions that makes other services in this country more affordable than almost anywhere else!

Bill B. said...

Why am I complaining? Because Bush is "cutting and running". Because the GOP has signed on to a "timetable to retreat".

Because Republics have started a war and lost it by surrendering, just to prevent President Obama proclaiming victory.

I note that you have already been withdrawn back to the USA tfhr. We can see you approve the GOP calendar for Iraq failure.

tfhr said...

Biddle,

My tour in Iraq is over but I may be headed back there or Afghanistan during the next few years.

Isn't it perverse that you will be disappointed if Iraq's government, and along with it, democracy survives in that country?

Will you scream for Obama's impeachment if every single one of our troops (U.S. embassy guards excluded) are not removed from Iraq within 16 months of his inauguration? I hope not since there is a war on and we are winning.