Democrats have been trying to shuffle money to Detroit since summer, but their timing has been off. The Michigan delegation's big push for auto funds coincided with September's financial crisis. With Washington in a panic, voters howling over $700 billion for banks, and an election in the offing, the leadership decided a Detroit bailout was one hot potato too many.Paulson isn't playing their game, so they'll have to pass their own sort of bill and take responsibility for what will most likely be a terribly unpopular move. When they control the entire government next year, they won't be able to shuffle this off on a disliked Bush administration. It will be their baby and we'll see if they want to take the bullet for giving federal money to bail out mismanaged companies just so they can save the union workers who helped to elect them in the first place.
This decision was made easier by the fact that the Big Three's balance sheets have made even sympathetic Washington spenders worry about throwing money at a bankruptcy. Democrats decided it would be better to direct the funds in a way that allowed them to later deny fault.
The plan? Make it the Bush administration's responsibility to give Detroit cash -- namely by claiming after the event that the $700 billion rescue package for financial institutions was in fact a rescue package for auto makers.
Friday, November 14, 2008
Pelosi and bailing out the car companies
Kimberley Strassel details how Nancy Pelosi has been trying to get the administration to use the money from the $700 billion to help out the car companies even though that is not what the money was meant for.
Labels:
Economics,
Nancy Pelosi
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Pelosi is opting for a quick vote now knowing it likely won't pass, because of GOP opposition or a Bush veto. After Obama and the new Democrat-controlled Congress come in, she can schedule another vote and it will pass. Democrats and the MSM can then serve up daily, tear-jerking reminders (hearings, if necessary) about how the cold-hearted GOP savaged Joe the Autoworker and the liberating Democrats came to his rescue.
Remember, P. T. Barnum's adage has worked for Democrats for decades.
That will kick the can down the road a while, but the $1500 per car that GM needs to pay the benefits of their retirees will need to come from somewhere. If it doesn't come from people voluntarily buying their vehicles, why should the we pay it?
You can argue that Social Security is a shared benefit, even if those who pay the most benefit proportionally less. This is welfare for some hightly compensated auto workers. I'm against welfare for corporate farms, and I'm against welfare for auto workers.
Post a Comment