Uh-oh, the fraud allegations are beginning

Pre-election polls were basically correct on the Republican side and in Iowa. They were quite off for the Democratic side in New Hampshire. Actually, Obama performed about as predicted. It's Clinton's total that is so much more than polls showed it would be. So how to explain that disparity. Most rational people would look to faults in the pre-election polls, but there are some who are jumping to the conclusion that the polls of people before the election took place and the exit polls are actually correct and something verrrry fishy went on with the vote counting. And what is delicious is that it is no longer the eeeevil Karl Rove who is responsible from stealing the election from a righteous Democrat, but the Clintons.

Joe Tobacco at Cadillac Tight has been digging through the threads of the Democratic Underground as they start discussing the fraud that must have gone on for Clinton to have won despite all that polling. Brad Friedman at Bradblog is putting the blame on Diebold machines. The conspiracies will be blooming all over the internet today.
(H/t Instapundit)

Here and here are some more people who have worked to figure out that Hillary won in the precincts that used Diebold machines and Obama won in the non-Diebold machine precints. Can you spell conspiracy? Apparently, the eeeevil Diebold people have gone from fixing races to help Bush to helping Hillary.