Betsy's Page 
      



HOME



Betsy neither necessarily uses,
nor endorses,
the products advertised on this site.








The 2008 Weblog Awards



Advance your career by earning a masters degree online.

The truth about Avesil

Wikio

Get exclusive travel deals and book discount cheap flights



Comments from an AP history
and government teacher in Raleigh, NC.

e-mail betsynewmark AT gmail.com




Commissions earned from selling items through Amazon will go towards buying materials for my classes. Thank you.



Site Feed

Buy Conservative Advertising





 

Friday, January 06, 2006

 
Charles Krauthammer expresses what a loss Ariel Sharon's stroke is for Israel. And he puts into perspective what Sharon has done to change Israel's vision of itself and the road to living a more safe and secure future.
Sharon's genius was to seize upon and begin implementing a third way. With a negotiated peace illusory and a Greater Israel untenable, he argued that the only way to security was a unilateral redrawing of Israel's boundaries by building a fence around a new Israel and withdrawing Israeli soldiers and settlers from the other side. The other side would become independent Palestine.

Accordingly, Sharon withdrew Israel entirely from Gaza. On the other front, the West Bank, the separation fence under construction will give the new Palestine about 93 percent of the West Bank. Israel's 7 percent share will encompass a sizable majority of Israelis who live on the West Bank. The rest, everyone understands, will have to evacuate back to Israel.

The success of this fence-plus-unilateral-withdrawal strategy is easily seen in the collapse of the intifada. Palestinian terrorist attacks are down 90 percent. Israel's economy has revived. In 2005, it grew at the fastest rate of the developed countries. Tourists are back, and the country has regained its confidence. The Sharon idea of a smaller but secure and demographically Jewish Israel garnered broad public support, marginalized the old parties of the left and right, and was on the verge of electoral success that would establish a new political center to carry on this strategy.

The problem is that the vehicle for this Sharonist centrism, his new Kadima Party, is only a few weeks old, has no institutional structure and is hugely dependent on the charisma of and public trust in Sharon.
Perhaps someone will emerge who has the same vision, but it will be difficult to muster the same level of support as someone with Sharon's history of military victories. We can all hope for Israel's future and for Sharon's health, which sadly doesn't seem to have much good news.

0 comments



Comments:
 
Charles Krauthammer expresses what a loss Ariel Sharon's stroke is for Israel. And he puts into perspective what Sharon has done to change Israel's vision of itself and the road to living a more safe and secure future.
Sharon's genius was to seize upon and begin implementing a third way. With a negotiated peace illusory and a Greater Israel untenable, he argued that the only way to security was a unilateral redrawing of Israel's boundaries by building a fence around a new Israel and withdrawing Israeli soldiers and settlers from the other side. The other side would become independent Palestine.

Accordingly, Sharon withdrew Israel entirely from Gaza. On the other front, the West Bank, the separation fence under construction will give the new Palestine about 93 percent of the West Bank. Israel's 7 percent share will encompass a sizable majority of Israelis who live on the West Bank. The rest, everyone understands, will have to evacuate back to Israel.

The success of this fence-plus-unilateral-withdrawal strategy is easily seen in the collapse of the intifada. Palestinian terrorist attacks are down 90 percent. Israel's economy has revived. In 2005, it grew at the fastest rate of the developed countries. Tourists are back, and the country has regained its confidence. The Sharon idea of a smaller but secure and demographically Jewish Israel garnered broad public support, marginalized the old parties of the left and right, and was on the verge of electoral success that would establish a new political center to carry on this strategy.

The problem is that the vehicle for this Sharonist centrism, his new Kadima Party, is only a few weeks old, has no institutional structure and is hugely dependent on the charisma of and public trust in Sharon.
Perhaps someone will emerge who has the same vision, but it will be difficult to muster the same level of support as someone with Sharon's history of military victories. We can all hope for Israel's future and for Sharon's health, which sadly doesn't seem to have much good news.

0 comments



Comments: Post a Comment




This page is powered by Blogger.