Betsy's Page

Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Isn't it something that, in the coverage of Saddam's trial, his antics of telling the judge off and saying that he won't return to the trial gets equal coverage of the terrible stories that the witnesses are telling? Or, rather it's not even equal coverage. In this story from Reuters, it isn't until the sixth paragraph that the witnesses' testimony gets a cursory mention. The bulk of the article is about Saddam's behavior in the trial. Why are his rants more newsworthy than the witnesses tales of torture?

Think of the article that could have been written if the reporter had covered the witnesses more in detail and contrasted their stories of torture and death with Saddam's complaints about not getting a shower and clean underwear?

Contrast Reuters coverage with this story from the Associated Press.
The most compelling testimony came from the woman identified only as “Witness A,” who was a 16-year-old girl at the time of the crackdown. Her voice breaking with emotion, she told the court of beatings and electric shocks by the former president’s agents.

“I was forced to take off my clothes and he raised my legs up and tied my hands. He continued administering electric shocks and whipping me and telling me to speak,” Witness A said of Wadah al-Sheik, an Iraqi intelligence officer who died of cancer last month while in U.S. custody.

The woman, speaking from behind a beige curtain, broke down several times as she struggled to maintain her composure.

“God is great. Oh, my Lord!” she said, moaning.

Such treatment of a young woman is gravely offensive in traditional Arab culture and Saddam was careful to avoid any insulting gesture in Tuesday’s session, which was televised in Iraq. On Monday, he angrily challenged male witnesses, insulting them and suggesting one needed psychiatric treatment.

“Witness A” strongly suggested she had been raped but did not say so outright. When Chief Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin asked her about the “assault,” she said: “I was beaten up and tortured by electrical shocks” but repeated she had been ordered to undress.

“They made me put my legs up. There were more than one of them, as if I were their banquet, maybe more than five people, all of them officers,” she said.
I think her story is much more compelling than Saddam's complaints about his lack of hygiene. Is this the tactics that Ramsay Clark has advised him will get him lots of play on the international news to counterbalance the stories of torturing 16 year old girls. Does the media have to fall for such obvious grandstanding?

UPDATE: John Hinderaker notes the importance of the judges in the Saddam trial getting control over the trial. They must counter the perception that Saddam is in control of anything, even one courtroom.

posted by Betsy Newmark permalink 6:49 AM 0 comments

Comments:

Isn't it something that, in the coverage of Saddam's trial, his antics of telling the judge off and saying that he won't return to the trial gets equal coverage of the terrible stories that the witnesses are telling? Or, rather it's not even equal coverage. In this story from Reuters, it isn't until the sixth paragraph that the witnesses' testimony gets a cursory mention. The bulk of the article is about Saddam's behavior in the trial. Why are his rants more newsworthy than the witnesses tales of torture?

Think of the article that could have been written if the reporter had covered the witnesses more in detail and contrasted their stories of torture and death with Saddam's complaints about not getting a shower and clean underwear?

Contrast Reuters coverage with this story from the Associated Press.

The most compelling testimony came from the woman identified only as “Witness A,” who was a 16-year-old girl at the time of the crackdown. Her voice breaking with emotion, she told the court of beatings and electric shocks by the former president’s agents.

“I was forced to take off my clothes and he raised my legs up and tied my hands. He continued administering electric shocks and whipping me and telling me to speak,” Witness A said of Wadah al-Sheik, an Iraqi intelligence officer who died of cancer last month while in U.S. custody.

The woman, speaking from behind a beige curtain, broke down several times as she struggled to maintain her composure.

“God is great. Oh, my Lord!” she said, moaning.

Such treatment of a young woman is gravely offensive in traditional Arab culture and Saddam was careful to avoid any insulting gesture in Tuesday’s session, which was televised in Iraq. On Monday, he angrily challenged male witnesses, insulting them and suggesting one needed psychiatric treatment.

“Witness A” strongly suggested she had been raped but did not say so outright. When Chief Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin asked her about the “assault,” she said: “I was beaten up and tortured by electrical shocks” but repeated she had been ordered to undress.

“They made me put my legs up. There were more than one of them, as if I were their banquet, maybe more than five people, all of them officers,” she said.

I think her story is much more compelling than Saddam's complaints about his lack of hygiene. Is this the tactics that Ramsay Clark has advised him will get him lots of play on the international news to counterbalance the stories of torturing 16 year old girls. Does the media have to fall for such obvious grandstanding?

UPDATE: John Hinderaker notes the importance of the judges in the Saddam trial getting control over the trial. They must counter the perception that Saddam is in control of anything, even one courtroom.

posted by Betsy Newmark permalink 6:49 AM 0 comments

Comments: Post a Comment

The truth about Avesil

Cheap Hosting

Atlanta Bankruptcy Attorney

Dallas Bankruptcy Attorney

Wikio

Get exclusive travel deals and book discount cheap flights

Online Bachelors Degree

Wednesday, December 07, 2005

		Betsy's Page

HOME Betsy neither necessarily uses, nor endorses, the products advertised on this site. The truth about Avesil Cheap Hosting Atlanta Bankruptcy Attorney Dallas Bankruptcy Attorney Wikio Get exclusive travel deals and book discount cheap flights Online Bachelors Degree Comments from an AP history and government teacher in Raleigh, NC. e-mail betsynewmark AT gmail.com Commissions earned from selling items through Amazon will go towards buying materials for my classes. Thank you. Site Feed		Wednesday, December 07, 2005 Isn't it something that, in the coverage of Saddam's trial, his antics of telling the judge off and saying that he won't return to the trial gets equal coverage of the terrible stories that the witnesses are telling? Or, rather it's not even equal coverage. In this story from Reuters, it isn't until the sixth paragraph that the witnesses' testimony gets a cursory mention. The bulk of the article is about Saddam's behavior in the trial. Why are his rants more newsworthy than the witnesses tales of torture? Think of the article that could have been written if the reporter had covered the witnesses more in detail and contrasted their stories of torture and death with Saddam's complaints about not getting a shower and clean underwear? Contrast Reuters coverage with this story from the Associated Press. The most compelling testimony came from the woman identified only as “Witness A,” who was a 16-year-old girl at the time of the crackdown. Her voice breaking with emotion, she told the court of beatings and electric shocks by the former president’s agents. “I was forced to take off my clothes and he raised my legs up and tied my hands. He continued administering electric shocks and whipping me and telling me to speak,” Witness A said of Wadah al-Sheik, an Iraqi intelligence officer who died of cancer last month while in U.S. custody. The woman, speaking from behind a beige curtain, broke down several times as she struggled to maintain her composure. “God is great. Oh, my Lord!” she said, moaning. Such treatment of a young woman is gravely offensive in traditional Arab culture and Saddam was careful to avoid any insulting gesture in Tuesday’s session, which was televised in Iraq. On Monday, he angrily challenged male witnesses, insulting them and suggesting one needed psychiatric treatment. “Witness A” strongly suggested she had been raped but did not say so outright. When Chief Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin asked her about the “assault,” she said: “I was beaten up and tortured by electrical shocks” but repeated she had been ordered to undress. “They made me put my legs up. There were more than one of them, as if I were their banquet, maybe more than five people, all of them officers,” she said. I think her story is much more compelling than Saddam's complaints about his lack of hygiene. Is this the tactics that Ramsay Clark has advised him will get him lots of play on the international news to counterbalance the stories of torturing 16 year old girls. Does the media have to fall for such obvious grandstanding? UPDATE: John Hinderaker notes the importance of the judges in the Saddam trial getting control over the trial. They must counter the perception that Saddam is in control of anything, even one courtroom. posted by Betsy Newmark permalink 6:49 AM 0 comments Comments: Isn't it something that, in the coverage of Saddam's trial, his antics of telling the judge off and saying that he won't return to the trial gets equal coverage of the terrible stories that the witnesses are telling? Or, rather it's not even equal coverage. In this story from Reuters, it isn't until the sixth paragraph that the witnesses' testimony gets a cursory mention. The bulk of the article is about Saddam's behavior in the trial. Why are his rants more newsworthy than the witnesses tales of torture? Think of the article that could have been written if the reporter had covered the witnesses more in detail and contrasted their stories of torture and death with Saddam's complaints about not getting a shower and clean underwear? Contrast Reuters coverage with this story from the Associated Press. The most compelling testimony came from the woman identified only as “Witness A,” who was a 16-year-old girl at the time of the crackdown. Her voice breaking with emotion, she told the court of beatings and electric shocks by the former president’s agents. “I was forced to take off my clothes and he raised my legs up and tied my hands. He continued administering electric shocks and whipping me and telling me to speak,” Witness A said of Wadah al-Sheik, an Iraqi intelligence officer who died of cancer last month while in U.S. custody. The woman, speaking from behind a beige curtain, broke down several times as she struggled to maintain her composure. “God is great. Oh, my Lord!” she said, moaning. Such treatment of a young woman is gravely offensive in traditional Arab culture and Saddam was careful to avoid any insulting gesture in Tuesday’s session, which was televised in Iraq. On Monday, he angrily challenged male witnesses, insulting them and suggesting one needed psychiatric treatment. “Witness A” strongly suggested she had been raped but did not say so outright. When Chief Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin asked her about the “assault,” she said: “I was beaten up and tortured by electrical shocks” but repeated she had been ordered to undress. “They made me put my legs up. There were more than one of them, as if I were their banquet, maybe more than five people, all of them officers,” she said. I think her story is much more compelling than Saddam's complaints about his lack of hygiene. Is this the tactics that Ramsay Clark has advised him will get him lots of play on the international news to counterbalance the stories of torturing 16 year old girls. Does the media have to fall for such obvious grandstanding? UPDATE: John Hinderaker notes the importance of the judges in the Saddam trial getting control over the trial. They must counter the perception that Saddam is in control of anything, even one courtroom. posted by Betsy Newmark permalink 6:49 AM 0 comments Comments: Post a Comment